When it comes to energy efficiency, Trane air conditioners are the clear winners. All models produced by Trane are more energy efficient than those of Carrier, making them better in terms of performance, warranty, SEER and energy efficiency. However, Carrier air conditioning units have an advantage over Trane units when it comes to maintenance and installation. Consumer Reports is a great source of information for topics like these.
They have become a leader in the review industry because they have the ability to collect and analyze a lot of objective data. Their ratings are based on actual failure rates and similar data, rather than on opinion gathering campaigns organized by marketers. When it comes down to it, the owners of both Trane and Carrier units seem to be satisfied with their choice. But Trane has a bit of an edge over Carrier in terms of longevity. Some users say that Trane systems last a minimum of 15 to 20 years, which can be a significant advantage that offsets their higher cost. Like Carrier, Trane regulates who can install its central air units.
Unlike Carrier and Lennox, all Trane air conditioners have a SEER of at least 14.5, keeping their units between the basic and the high-efficiency range. Four of Trane's air conditioning units are on the ENERGY STAR efficiency list, placing them among Carrier and Lennox. When deciding between Trane and Carrier air conditioners, it is important to consider all factors such as energy efficiency, maintenance costs, installation costs, warranty coverage, and longevity. Both brands offer quality products that will keep your home cool and comfortable for years to come.
